Adam Jackson

If you have something to say to me, you can address me directly. Instead, you chose to cower on your obscure blog in an Internet backwater, using strawman arguments and taking everything in the worst light possible.

You don't even know me, and interpreted what was said by me through the filter of a someone else's reporting. To that end you used the article as a vehicle for you to be insulting and pedantic.

It's not as if my name is John Q. Smith, and you couldn't find me. Nor would it have been hard to find me via the writer of the original article, if you really wanted to discuss my quoted comments. ... See More

But that wasn't what your blog was about, was it. It was about trashing someone who you knew would not respond to you. In that you were very likely correct as I only found your blog by chance. Hiding in anonymity on the Internet is what you rail against, but you decided to hide in another fashion: via obscurity.

Well, I'll tell ya. I'm not afraid of addressing you directly, and to tell you exactly what I think, and why. It is too bad you don't have enough courage to do the same for the people you decide to put down and call names of.

It was quite cowardly, and while I may have my own faults, your behavior is nothing to take pride in.

What blog was it?

Ah it was this one. Sure I'll send you a direct messag about it.

http://blog.adam-jackson.net/2009/05/04/sfgate-comments-on-anonymity/