- Category:
- Organizations -
- Description:
- This group is to fight to hook up Armenia to a lie detector machine.
Bu grubun amaci Ermeni iddialarinin yalan oldugunu kanitlamak. - Privacy Type:
- Open: All content is public.
- Hatice
- Armenia's constitution claims land in eastern Turkey
- Bugra
- 1915 events are defined as civil war
- Can
- Unlike Armenian archives, Turkish archives have been open to everyone

Buğra

Recognize Armenia as the Liar
Join
- Name:
- Recognize Armenia as the Liar
- Category:
- Organizations -
- Description:
- This group is to fight to hook up Armenia to a lie detector machine.
Bu grubun amaci Ermeni iddialarinin yalan oldugunu kanitlamak. - Privacy Type:
- Open: All content is public.
- News:
- October 17, 2007
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that she was reconsidering her pledge to force a vote on a resolution condemning as genocide the mass killing of Armenians starting in 1915, as President Bush intensified his push to derail the legislation." NYT
March 14, 2007
Israel rejected to recognize the Armenian claims as a real genocide.
WHY AND HOW DID FRANCE RECOGNIZE THE ARMENIAN CLAIMS?
Of the 577 members of the (French) Assembly, 106 deputies voted in favor and 19 against, while 4 abstained and 448 did not vote at all. As expected, it has provoked intense negative media reactions in Turkey. Orhan Pamuk (the 2006 Nobel Prize winner Turkish author), French President Jacques Chirac and Daniel Fried, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, expressed their concerns about the new law. The bill in France has been criticized by Turks as an attempt to garner votes amongst the 500,000 people of Armenian descent in the 2007 presidential elections.
COUNTRIES THAT DO NOT RECOGNIZE THE CLAIMS:
The vast majority of countries (172 out of 194) including the United States, the United Kingdom, Israel, Azerbaijan, and Georgia (the last two being Armenia's neighbors), do not recognize the claims.
--- --- --- --- ---
Join the anti-genocide movement:
http://www.genocideintervention.net/index.php?gclid=CP3n2bqGxYoCFRRESAodwGbcfg
--- --- --- --- ---
RESEARCH-ARASTIRMA
http://www.eraren.org/index.php?Page=Sayfa&No=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Turkism
http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2006/07/863-armenian-issue-in-russian-state.html
http://www.pkkterror.com
http://www.middleeastinfo.org/forum/index.php?s=1d0d23987e70a9f0d7ebd70395f581c5&showtopic=13039&pid=105667&st=0&#entry105667
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Massacre
http://www.tsk.mil.tr/ermeni%5Fsorunu%5Fsalonu
http://www.tallarmeniantale.com
http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/intro/index.html
http://liearmeniangenocide.blogspot.com/
http://www.tgb.org.tr
http://www.ataa.org/
http://www.gencvatan.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=236&Itemid=46
http://www.anarmenianmyth.com
http://www.armenianreality.com
http://www.armenian-genocide-lie.com
http://www.devletarsivleri.gov.tr/kitap/
http://entelturkiye.blogspot.com/
ARTICLES-YAZILAR
http://www.turkses.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=516&Itemid=33
http://www.theturkishtimes.com/archive/02/08_15/o_weems.html
http://www.armenianreality.com/armenian_terror/mccarthy.htm
http://www.thenewanatolian.com/tna-3049.html
--- --- --- --- ---
WHAT DO EXPERTS SAY?
BERNARD LEWIS (Princeton University)
Le Monde, 2002
"There is no evidence of a decision to (Armenian) massacre. On the contrary, there is considerable evidence of attempt to prevent it, which were not very successful. Yes there were tremendous massacres, the numbers are very uncertain but a million may well be likely," and that because of this and other significant differences between the Armenian massacres and the Holocaust, parallels are "rather absurd". In 2006 he re-iterated this point, arguing that "the issue is not whether the massacres happened or not, but rather if these massacres were as a result of a deliberate preconceived decision of the Turkish government," and that "there is no evidence for such a decision."
PROF. JUSTIN MCCARTHY (University of Louisville)
"The Blue Book written by Viscount Bryce and Arnold Toynbee has been used as proof that Armenians and the victims of the Jewish Holocaust suffered the same fate in history. This book has been said to be a product of British intelligence designed to promote and promulgate lies during World War I. Britain had set up the war propaganda bureau at Wellington House for the sole purpose of promoting lies and misinformation on Germany and the Ottoman Empire. The British were in full co-operation with American missionaries in Anatolia and the American Embassy in Istanbul conjured a so called Armenian genocide based on gossip, hear-say and erroneous information.
The real purpose behind this exercise was to create and strengthen an image in the minds of British military officers that the Turk were evil, horrible and untrustworthy McCarthy adds.
PROF. STANFORD SHAW (Bilkent University)
Prof. Stanford J. Shaw, the historian who challenged the Armenian claims of genocide at the hands of the late Ottomans and provided evidence of Turkey’s aiding and fostering Jews during WWII, died on Saturday at the age of 76. Shaw was a professor of Turkish history at Bilkent University in Ankara and at UCLA as well as the founder of the International Journal of Middle East Studies, published by the Cambridge University Press for the Middle East Studies Association.
Shaw's house in California was bombed in 1977 by Armenian extremists as a result of his research on the alleged genocide.Shaw served as an assistant and associate professor of Turkish language and history at the department of history at Harvard University from 1958 until 1968 and as professor of Turkish history at the University of California Los Angeles from 1968 until 1997. His final post was at Bilkent University as professor of Ottoman and Turkish history from 1999 to 2006.(www.turkses.com)
HRANT DINK (Turkish Armenian journalist)
Hrant Dink, was strictly against the Armenian bill in the French parliament. Dink had protested the bill and said “I will go to France and say that there is no genocide to protest the bill”.
(http://www.turkishweekly.net/news.php?id=42208)
PROF. NORMAN STONE (British historian of modern Europe, especially Central and Eastern Europe, served at the University of Oxford)
Diaspora Armenians claim that ‘historians’ accept the genocide case. There is some preposterous organization called ‘association of genocide scholars’ which does indeed endorse the Diaspora line, but who are they and what qualifications do they have? Knowing about Rwanda or Bosnia or even Auschwitz does not qualify them to discuss Anatolia in 1915, and the Ottoman specialists are by no means convinced of the ‘genocide’. There is in fact an ‘A’ team of distinguished historians who do not accept the Diaspora line at all. In France, Gilles Veinstein, historian of Salonica and a formidable scholar, reviewed the evidence in a famous article of 1993 in L’Histoire. Back then the Armenian Diaspora were also jumping up and down about something or other, and Veinstein summed up the arguments for and against, in an admirably fair-minded way. The fact is that there is no proof of ‘genocide’, in the sense that no document ever appeared, indicating that the Armenians were to be exterminated. There is forged evidence. (To read the continuation: http://www.turkishweekly.net/comments.php?id=2326)
--- --- --- --- ---
WHAT DID REALLY HAPPEN?
http://www.ermenisorunu.gen.tr/english/relocation/definition.html
http://www.turkishweekly.net/comments.php?id=2376