Bjørn Lomborg

Det er helt rigtigt; Hr. Gore tjente en skilling, et tre cifret million dollar bel... See Moreøb, som ligger i lommen mens han flyver til Davos i sin private jet og blærer sig: Drama og poesi; pop og overfladiske statements. Se på hans private equity portfolio i greentech og hans kærlighed for personlig profit... kræver lidt research, men det kan skarpe hjerner sagtens selv klare...

Jeg savner noget hård videnskab istedet for propaganda og pop. Han smider om sig med "gennemsnit" og statistik -- men som altid er der meget få folk som rent faktisk læste og forstår statistik; specielt kritik. Regning fik vi masser af i folkeskolen, endda anden grads polynomier og den slags - men simpel statistik? Simpel økonomi -- nej, det er jo for farligt...at forstå virkeligheden som er en del mere kompleks end en spille film.

Increased atmospheric moisture and solar reflectivity, driven by surface, and sub oceanic increases, in geothermal and volcanic activity, exacerbated by "deep solar quiet" (NASA), are, unfortunately, not a hoax too. Fluff your fur kitties.
It's ice age stuff.
http://iceagenow.com/Its_a_cycle-its_a_cycle-its_a_cycle.htm

They are attacking the problem the wrong way, no deal is better from a cost benefit analysis point of view

the climate change movement needs more people like you bjorn, you understand the human nature and how we need to recognize that in order to advance in our goals, and that not only applies to climate change but everything... keep the good work

Thank you for keeping us updated

you go Bjorn- keep us informed

One thing's for sure: here in the U.S. most ordinary folks rate 'Climate Change' slightly greater in importance than whether or not their dog's getting enough B12 in its diet....which is to say, not at all.

Fantastic! Congratulations on print in the WSJ. That's quite a coup and will reach a huge audience. Good work!

nice article. But i want to ask why is the promotion if 'less meat consumption' not higher up on any agenda, esp CC but for all environmental/ecological and i dare say even poverty issues in developing countries. between the UNFAO and recent worldwatch study the GHG contribution is anywhere from 18-51%, easily the biggest and hence for everyone, ... See Moreesp big meat eaters in developed countries its the most effective way to cut emissions. If you dig deeper into crazy farm subsidies and the ultimate effects it has had on mexico/south america, Africa, asia.. - it also seems like the obvious solution?
Look I'm no crazy vegan (not that vegans are crazy...), but when I read about all the environment affects from meat production it seems like the most pragmatic and logical place to start if one was serious about saving the planet and the environment would be with our food choices.

Bjorn you remain one of the few prominent clear thinkers on this topic. There is warming, it is human caused, yet we must process the problem and the potential actions rationally. Why is this obvious course of action so elusive?