DK Matai's Photos

    
Sameh Saad
    
Sherihan Ibrahim Yehia
    
Abdullah Ibrahim
    
Benjamin Bradstreet
    

Innovation, Anthropology and Cultural Relativity

Just as large development projects can fail if agencies do not understand their target communities, commercial products can also fail if companies do not understand their customers. Where a sociologist might put together a questionnaire to understand what people think of an object, an anthropologist would immerse themselves in the subject and try to understand it from "within"! With the arrival of micro and nano devices, anthropology has witnessed a mini-renaissance in the 21st century. As our lives become ever more exposed to technology, and companies become much more interested in how technology affects us and how we interface with it, anthropologists have found themselves in increasing demand.

Anthropology is the holistic, global, comparative study of human beings and of their interactions with each other and the environment. It increasingly looks at the impact of technological dimensions on humanity's progress and our future development. Anthropology has been a discipline shrouded in mystery, with few people ever questioning what it does. However, now that anthropologists are playing with search engines, mobile phones, satellite navigation and digital television, there is growing interest. In today’s high-tech world, anthropologists are becoming much more essential and increasingly visible!

The more technology is integrated into everyday life, the more we are in need of paying attention to its effects. Contemporary studies of the social and cultural effects of the technology of print are a case in point. In history, print-technology permitted the emergence of new scientific disciplines and new ways of thinking including new religions and socio-economic doctrines. The way we acquire, record, transmit and publish data has changed enormously over the last few decades, with many solutions rendered obsolete along the way. Witness the near-death of photographic film in the last few years, as it is completely superseded by new digital media. The study of visual anthropology in the 1970s is an excellent template for mapping the impact of computing in the 1990s and the evolution of cyber culture in the 21st century. The uptake of small electronic devices had radical implications for the conduct of humanity starting a few decades ago. The recent accessibility and portability of information technology, including search engines anywhere and at anytime, is again morphing the digital landscape. This facilitates not only the collection and dissemination of visual and aural data, but its integration with everyday human activities on a scale not previously envisaged.

Anthropology is now described as the scientific study of the origin; the behaviour; and the physical, social, and cultural development of humans. It is distinguished from other social sciences –- such as sociology –- by its emphasis on what’s called Cultural Relativity! This is the principle that an individual's beliefs and activities should be interpreted in terms of his or her own culture, not that of the observer. Anthropology also offers an in-depth examination of context –- the social and physical conditions under which people live –- and a focus on cross-cultural comparison. That's comparing one culture to another!

The body of knowledge that led to the development of Cultural Relativism has its origins in the German Enlightenment. The philosopher Immanuel Kant argued that human beings are not capable of direct, unmediated knowledge of the world. All of our experiences of the world are mediated through the human mind, which universally structures perceptions according to sensibilities concerning time and space. Franz Boas, the Father of American Anthropology, first articulated the principle of Cultural Relativity in the late 19th century: "...civilisation is not something absolute, but...is relative, and...our ideas and conceptions are true only so far as our civilisation goes."

The emerging anthropology of cyberspace deals with cybernetic systems, the culturally informed interrelationships between human beings and proliferating technologies. These inter-relationships include the attempts to fuse technological artefacts with human and other biological organisms, with human society, and with culturally shaped environments. When anthropologists started working with microprocessor firms in the late 1990s, they were accused of selling out! Today, anthropologists jump at the chance to help influence future innovation and, for many, working in the technology industry has become THE thing to do. In the technology sector –- particularly within emerging market divisions –- it is now not uncommon to find anthropologists working within the corridors of leading companies including smart chip and mobile device manufacturers.

As a result, mobile devices are closing the digital divide across the world in a way the Personal Computer never could. International development agencies are now pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into economic, health and educational initiatives based around mobile devices, phones and technology. The explosive growth of mobile-phone ownership in the developing world is largely attributed to a vibrant recycling market and the arrival of cheap USD 20 phones. Anthropologists working for mobile telephone companies spend increasing amounts of time trying to understand what people living at the "bottom of the pyramid" might want from a phone.

In order for mobile devices to reach their full potential, we still need to understand fully what people in developing countries need from their digital communication products and how they can be introduced and applied in a way that has a positive impact on their lives. This is exactly where anthropologists and cultural relativity step into the equation!

[ENDS]

We welcome your thoughts, observations and views. To reflect further on this, please respond within Twitter, Linked and Facebook's ATCA Open and related Socratic dialogue platform of HQR.

All the best


DK Matai

Chairman and Founder: mi2g.net, ATCA, The Philanthropia, HQR, @G140

To connect directly with:

. DK Matai: http://twitter.com/DKMatai

. Open HQR: http://twitter.com/OpenHQR

. ATCA Open: http://twitter.com/ATCAOpen

. @G140: http://twitter.com/G140

. mi2g: http://twitter.com/intunit

- ATCA, The Philanthropia, mi2g, HQR, @G140 --

This is an "ATCA Open, Philanthropia and HQR Socratic Dialogue."

The "ATCA Open" network on LinkedIn and Facebook is for professionals interested in ATCA's original global aims, working with ATCA step-by-step across the world, or developing tools supporting ATCA's objectives to build a better world.

The original ATCA -- Asymmetric Threats Contingency Alliance -- is a philanthropic expert initiative founded in 2001 to resolve complex global challenges through collective Socratic dialogue and joint executive action to build a wisdom based global economy. Adhering to the doctrine of non-violence, ATCA addresses asymmetric threats and social opportunities arising from climate chaos and the environment; radical poverty and microfinance; geo-politics and energy; organised crime & extremism; advanced technologies -- bio, info, nano, robo & AI; demographic skews and resource shortages; pandemics; financial systems and systemic risk; as well as transhumanism and ethics. Present membership of the original ATCA network is by invitation only and has over 5,000 distinguished members from over 120 countries: including 1,000 Parliamentarians; 1,500 Chairmen and CEOs of corporations; 1,000 Heads of NGOs; 750 Directors at Academic Centres of Excellence; 500 Inventors and Original thinkers; as well as 250 Editors-in-Chief of major media.

The Philanthropia, founded in 2005, brings together over 1,000 leading individual and private philanthropists, family offices, foundations, private banks, non-governmental organisations and specialist advisors to address complex global challenges such as countering climate chaos, reducing radical poverty and developing global leadership for the younger generation through the appliance of science and technology, leveraging acumen and finance, as well as encouraging collaboration with a strong commitment to ethics. Philanthropia emphasises multi-faith spiritual values: introspection, healthy living and ecology. Philanthropia Targets: Countering climate chaos and carbon neutrality; Eliminating radical poverty -- through micro-credit schemes, empowerment of women and more responsible capitalism; Leadership for the Younger Generation; and Corporate and social responsibility.
— with Abdullah Ibrahim, Benjamin Bradstreet, Sameh Saad and Sherihan Ibrahim Yehia.
  • Michael Buchanan, Ingrid Marie Aquino, Robin Lynn Ore and 20 others like this.
    • Suha Yuce As stated by George Bernard Shaw," The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” The question is not simply what people in developing countries need from their digital communication products and how they can be introduced, but how can more be done in its dispensation.
      January 6, 2010 at 11:55am
    • Bart Norré
      Thank you for that stimulating article. There are a few things I could share here but let me just share a reflection on the relationship between Technology and Needs.
      Technology may change the world but not necessarily the underlying needs.... People are resisting change and most of them do not like it.
      So how come technology is still and ever so hype? I personnaly think that technology is succesfull when it can relate to the existing fundamental needs and extend its possibilities to fullfill it.
      eg people do not need mobile phoning "an sich" that's not the need. The need is people like to feel connected and to communicate. Without this need no mobile phoning market.
      It is said a technology needs 10 years to get adopted but who adopts who? The people the technology or the technology the customer's needs?
      Of course there are tremendous changes troughout history of the past and the history we are writing right now. But all these changes have to be based on needs. But are these therefore new needs?
      See More
      January 6, 2010 at 12:20pm · 1
    • Diane Wallrich I agree with you, Bart. Many people feel overwhelmed by changes that overtake the last one before time to assimilate and use{or not] the new.
      March 25, 2010 at 3:45pm · 1
    • Michael Buchanan
      The unfortunate aspect I see is that the Corps. and Marketing whizzes think they know what we humans need, or project into our consciousness that which they want us to believe we need. Not our true needs at all. So, what I am eager to see i...s how these Technocrats will handle the looming debacle of Food Shortage throughout the world. Now that truly is a need worth putting some energy into, don't you think. We need a new morality at the top of the heap! ";-)See More
      March 25, 2010 at 5:29pm · 1
    • Princess Maya
      ‎@Michael... I am not trying to be cynical, however, I think, it is the quest of humanity to find way to expanded consciousness, despite of any of our surroundings. I also believe, the more one grows / reincarnates, the less likely they wil...l depend on any outside influences ... that is our challenge ... if everything would be handed on the golden platter, humanity would not have any steps forward. If you remember the book "who moved my cheese". ... that's my two cents .. See More
      March 25, 2010 at 6:02pm
    • Stephen Bogart LeBow
      ‎@ Michael and Maya...I agree with Michael...but I also agree with Maya. lol.
      With respect to what Michael says...marketing, advertising, broadcasting, historically in the last 50 years has been appealing to the masses...the lowest common ...denominator..."broad"casting and not "narrow"casting..to get the biggest audience, share, readership, viewership,listnership, to get the "biggest bang for the buck"and in a sense haven't they also been "dumbing down"America while also seeling us products or info or persuading us into different things, points, or positions, ifor, ideas,and the like. The coming ahead will be most interesting.
      However, I agree with Maya ..or at least in part..I think it is our quest to find expended or increased consciousness..but is it all of humanity?or the whole of humanity?...or is it the quest of only those enlightened ones, chosen ones, spiritual ones? Yes, upon/with growth and reincarnations I think it is less likely we will depend on outside influences...but it that the whole of society or only of the aforementioned few? ...and yes, true..if things were handed to us on a silver platter, if we were not presented obstacles, hurdles, problems, we would not make make steps of forward progress. ..and thats' my two cents...and two cents ...
      =4 cents....lol.... :-)
      See More
      March 25, 2010 at 7:10pm · 2
    • Princess Maya
      ‎@Stephen ... I agree with you in respect to both observations. I am very very hesitant to offer my opinion on above mentioned topics, as it could be quite controversial. However, here it goes ... yes, absolutely, 3/4 of US GDP is based on ...consumption and in order to achieve this, we need to persuade the audience that they need these goods and services. As a matter of fact, without these goods and services, the audience it virtually a "handicap".... that is why they consume goods and services and economy goes forward ... on another hand, for a unsophisticated members, consumption of material goods and services becomes way of life and, thus, creates competition, self-centeredness, envy, jealousy, plain stupidity etc … HOWEVER …. I do not think that it is a responsibility of the marketers, government or other entities to foster spiritual / self growth. That would be against all economic principals. In order to work, the economy needs consumers – that’s the bottom line … another HOWEVER … It is up to each individual to be what they are…. If they are motivated by self-interests and only self centered and material items are of their interest, they have their place according the Maslow’s Hierarchy if needs … No one is responsible for someone else’s personal growth. Only we are responsible for ourselves. Therefore, we cannot really blame anyone … but ourselves. You have mentioned: “is this pertain to the whole humanity”. Well, we all know the answer…. No, never…. (at least not in the linear time). We all undergoing different growth patterns, and it takes more than one life to acquire the ‘knowledge’… and yes … very ‘select’ …. as I said, I am very hesitant to say such things … but maybe here are another two cents … to make it six … lolSee More
      March 25, 2010 at 7:35pm · 2
    • Stephen Bogart LeBow
      Well said Maya...i hear ya...or as they say today..I feel ya. Lol..:-)...I agree with you..however..some of us..may have been reincarnated to connect with and to inform the masses, educate and enlighten the masses,or, if not the masses, the... enlightened ones...:-) Heretofore, yo have been reluctant, hesitant, reticent, to let your views on such subjects be known...in part due to a then (not now) lack of confidence on such subjects, and also because you were taught and conditioned to thinking..it "does not make good business sense" to talk of such things in public. However, now you shall go through a transition where you shall no longer feel that way and shall be encouraged to voice, to speak out, and to take action in such areas, in concert with others, because you, my dear, have the ability to be a leader in such areas and a wide variety of areas and to be helpful to your fellow man. :-)) I Am/we are blessed to know you, dear one! :-) God Bless you! xoxoSee More
      March 25, 2010 at 8:12pm · 2
    • Princess Maya
      Well, there are many reasons ... one of them is that what is sense and what I think, most likely will not be well understood .. additionally, individuals should arrive to the truth themselves, otherwise, knowledge might be too dangerous for... those who are not ready ... but yes, i sure agree, it is a good thing to let people to discover the knowledge by leading them to the methods of such discoveries ... so true .... you are right ... more and more people tune in ... See More
      March 26, 2010 at 5:18am · 1
    • Stephen Bogart LeBow Maya...are you saying a little knowledge is dangerous? LOL....;-)...I know hon..I agree.
      Maya...we shall talk...we shall have many talks...:-)
      Many blessings and much love....:-) xo
      March 26, 2010 at 5:36am
    • Robin Lynn Ore
      The best book ever written on this subject of Technological versus Sociological advancement was "The Ascent of Man" by J. Brownowsky.

      Embedded devices are already expanding worldwide and the networks are already in place. Our human rights ...need to be the opt out of neuromarketing first with a "Do Not Call List" involving a mandate for no GPS positioning by MMW or Satellite. For this, one has to stop all wireless devices in your home, unfortunately and anonymity and "privacy" issues only help the criminal. Your information is not private already from advertising agencies, who micro-profile you and who now have unregulated access to medical devices through communications devices. There was a hearing about it last fall on Capital Hill.

      Now why would an advertising agency need access to your medical devices? Think about it. It is time to stop talking and act. We have to stop neuromarketing now. Timing is everything and your life may hang in the balance of a future where the speed of light is more important to you than food for both life enhancement and life threats.
      See More
      March 26, 2010 at 11:21am · 1
    • Princess Maya ‎@Stephen ... this is how sharing the knowledge gets abused and misunderstood ....
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8TRk_fargQ .....
      March 26, 2010 at 1:15pm
    • Stephen Bogart LeBow Sadly, Yes it goes with the territory. We shall experience the same in the future, Maya. C'est la vie. what can u do? Sad but true....
      March 26, 2010 at 5:13pm · 1
    • Princess Maya True ... C'est la vie ...
      March 26, 2010 at 6:32pm · 1
    • Ingrid Marie Aquino Wow..You all are on it...as ' they' used to say "like white on rice"..I guess or rather I know 'ignorance is not bliss'...(i noticed this thread was in January..looks as if I am a' little behind' onkeeping up on Fb---Namaste...
      November 11, 2010 at 2:20pm
    • Michael Buchanan
      Discourses that deal with relevant and deep subject matter will continue to be appropriately discussed for sometime in the future ingrid. Thanks for bringing attention back to this topic! We are blessed by the tools we have at our disposal ...for connecting and sharing our 2 cents, as the others mentioned. It behooves us all to revisit topics that stir and call us to action in areas that profoundly need addressing. Personally, I still say we need to utilize more of the mental capacity to remedy some of these intense challenges facing humanity today, for in truth Princess Maya, it is all SPIRITUAL! ";-)See More
      November 21, 2010 at 12:34am
    • Ingrid Marie Aquino ♥ I agree, Michael, It Is All SPIRITUAL....the wake -up call is in process...3< Namaste..
      November 21, 2010 at 12:53am · 1
    • Ingrid Marie Aquino ‎...♥...>>Namaste..sorry ...♥
      November 21, 2010 at 12:55am