
Tenth Amendment Center The Utah Firearms Freedom Act has been pre-filed with, and has passed, an interim committee of the Utah Legislature.
Kilde: blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
According to a report by ABC4 in Salt Lake City, UT State Senator Margaret Dayton has prepared a Firearms Freedom Act (FFA) to be introduced in when the 2010 legislation starts in January.

Tenth Amendment Center "The Tenth Amendment clarified that the federal government enjoyed only the powers listed in the Constitution and no others."
Kilde: www.tenthamendmentcenter.com
What is particularly surprising in light of this history and the Tenth Amendment’s explicit wording, is that some people still argued that the federal government had a vast reservoir of “inherent sovereign authority.”

Tenth Amendment Center "All just political authority is derived from the People, and government may only be established and maintained with their consent"
Kilde: blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
Running for Governor in 2010, Ron Ramsey has stepped up to the plate in support of the 10th Amendment and limited, Constitutional government.

Tenth Amendment Center Obamacare is Constitutional under the general Welfare clause? Constitutional Scholar literally laughs. Listen to the interview, and please leave comments on the site as well.
Kilde: www.tenthamendmentcenter.com
In this podcast, you’ll learn not only the original meaning of the general Welfare clause, but where it’s gone, and why we need the limits it provides.

Tenth Amendment Center Great video - Tom Woods and Kevin Gutzman on Fox.
Kilde: blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
Recently, Andrew Napolitano sat in as a guest host on the Glenn Beck show. He interviewed both Kevin Gutzman and Thomas E. Woods, who are two of the country’s leading minds on state sovereignty issues. Powerful stuff. Watch it:

Sarah Rosa The new website looks great! Just wanted to let you know that! Thanks for all you do.

Tenth Amendment Center How can taking what belongs to another person (their money, time, or effort) through legislative force be a “right”?
Kilde: www.tenthamendmentcenter.com
Before government can guarantee provision of a specific good or service to any one individual, thus creating a so-called “positive right,” it must first take by force the means of producing that very good or service from someone else.

Richard Brown
EPA Employees Silenced for Criticizing Cap and Trade
by William La Jeunesse , FOXNews.com
When Zabel and Williams released a video on the Internet expressing their concerns over the Obama administration’s plans to use a cap and trade program to fight climate change, they were told to keep it to themselves.
Laurie Wil...liams and husband Alan Zabel worked as lawyers for the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, in its San Francisco office for more than 20 years, and they know more about climate change than most politicians. But when the couple released a video on the Internet expressing their concerns over the Obama administration’s plans to use cap-and-trade legislation to fight climate change, they were told to keep it to themselves.
Williams and Zabel oppose cap and trade -- a controversial government allowance program in which companies are issued emissions limits, or caps, which they can then trade -- as a means to fight climate change.
On their own time, Williams and Zabel made a video expressing these opinions.
VIDEO: EPA Employees Speak Out Against Cap and Trade http://video.foxnews.com/11685042/gag-or der/?category_id=c985e69916535a2170b2b18 ab0ab7eb60401f9bb
"Cap-and-trade with offsets provides a false sense of progress and puts money in the pockets of investors," Zabel said in the video. "We think that these restrictions might not be constitutional," he said.
Their bosses in San Francisco approved the effort by Williams and Zabel to release the tape, but after an editorial they wrote appeared in the Washington Post, EPA Director Lisa Jackson ordered the pair to remove the video or face disciplinary action.
Specifically, the administration's chief environmental official did not want Williams or Zabel mentioning their four decades with the EPA -- time spent studying cap and trade.
"The people who understand the problems with the cap and trade with offsets bill are not being heard," Williams told Fox News.
The EPA issued a statement saying it welcomes free expression provided employees adhere to ethics rules. The agency reportedly doesn't object to the content of the video but requires Williams and Zabel to make it clearer that they are speaking for themselves and not the EPA.
But some Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee want an investigation into what – if any -- regulations Zabel and Williams violated.
Critics argue the action contradicts the president's support for open government.
"It's censorship," Jeff Ruch, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, told Fox News.
"If the Obama administration believes in transparency it is precisely in these cases they need to prove it."
Læs mere
by William La Jeunesse , FOXNews.com
When Zabel and Williams released a video on the Internet expressing their concerns over the Obama administration’s plans to use a cap and trade program to fight climate change, they were told to keep it to themselves.
Laurie Wil...liams and husband Alan Zabel worked as lawyers for the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, in its San Francisco office for more than 20 years, and they know more about climate change than most politicians. But when the couple released a video on the Internet expressing their concerns over the Obama administration’s plans to use cap-and-trade legislation to fight climate change, they were told to keep it to themselves.
Williams and Zabel oppose cap and trade -- a controversial government allowance program in which companies are issued emissions limits, or caps, which they can then trade -- as a means to fight climate change.
On their own time, Williams and Zabel made a video expressing these opinions.
VIDEO: EPA Employees Speak Out Against Cap and Trade http://video.foxnews.com/11685042/gag-or
"Cap-and-trade with offsets provides a false sense of progress and puts money in the pockets of investors," Zabel said in the video. "We think that these restrictions might not be constitutional," he said.
Their bosses in San Francisco approved the effort by Williams and Zabel to release the tape, but after an editorial they wrote appeared in the Washington Post, EPA Director Lisa Jackson ordered the pair to remove the video or face disciplinary action.
Specifically, the administration's chief environmental official did not want Williams or Zabel mentioning their four decades with the EPA -- time spent studying cap and trade.
"The people who understand the problems with the cap and trade with offsets bill are not being heard," Williams told Fox News.
The EPA issued a statement saying it welcomes free expression provided employees adhere to ethics rules. The agency reportedly doesn't object to the content of the video but requires Williams and Zabel to make it clearer that they are speaking for themselves and not the EPA.
But some Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee want an investigation into what – if any -- regulations Zabel and Williams violated.
Critics argue the action contradicts the president's support for open government.
"It's censorship," Jeff Ruch, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, told Fox News.
"If the Obama administration believes in transparency it is precisely in these cases they need to prove it."
Læs mere

Tenth Amendment Center
Ron Paul: "Government cannot be the answer to every human ill. Continuing to view more government as the solution to problems will only make matters worse"
Also, please check out our new site design, test out the commenting system, let us know if you experience any troubles!
Kilde: www.tenthamendmentcenter.com
Money and power are important only because the government wields power not granted by the Constitution. A limited, constitutional government would not tempt special interests to buy the politicians who wield power. The whole process feeds on itself. Everyone is rewarded by ignoring constitutional re...

Tenth Amendment Center "just as there are Hamilton’s legions today advocating a larger and larger central government, there are also Jefferson’s legions wanting to eviscerate the size and reach of the federal government."
Kilde: blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
Perhaps the status quo is no longer holding; people are growing more and more dissatisfied with their options, whether democrat or republican.

This group is dedicated to the principles of limited government, free markets,and individual liberty. This is a place to share news, information, thoughts, ideas, concerns and opinions.

Tenth Amendment Center
We are having some serious issues with our web host today (and this past weekend), which is resulting in all our sites being completely down. We've been in contact with their tech support and they assure us that they're "working hard to resolve this asap." We'll see.
With the amount we're paying for premium servic...es, we do hope it is "asap!"
If you'd like notice on when things are back to normal, send an email to info@tenthamendmentcenter.com to subscribe to our updates
Our apologies to everyone who's tried to visit the site!Læs mere
With the amount we're paying for premium servic...es, we do hope it is "asap!"
If you'd like notice on when things are back to normal, send an email to info@tenthamendmentcenter.com to subscribe to our updates
Our apologies to everyone who's tried to visit the site!Læs mere

Jack Moran I think you are on to something and I plan on becoming active with the movement here in Indiana.

Jeff May
WE
have a lot of people working the fereral level but I do not hear much
about the state. We have SJR 7 introduced, HRC 11 stalled, and HB 315
in the house why are we pushing our state reps. Lets get the ball
rolling in Ohio.

Tenth Amendment Center "blaming the Constitution for the failure of Americans (namely politicians) to uphold it is akin to blaming a gun for a murder."
Kilde: blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com
This is just the opening salvo in what I hope to be a friendly and cordial debate among liberty enthusiasts regarding what role “constitutionalism” has to play in the future of the movement to fight statism and restore the protection of individual rights.























