Topic: Scorecard
Displaying all 6 posts by 4 people.
Post #1
Neil wroteon August 24, 2008 at 9:12am
What would be the bottom-line (measurable) outcome of our core communications team?
And what would be the key drivers along the way?
And what would be the key drivers along the way?
Post #2
Neil wroteon August 24, 2008 at 9:20am
So far in our working wiki-page (the scorecard gadget), I've suggested a dirty-dozen metrics *smile* to consider.
Let's start with the bottom-line bottomline bottom-line metric we're going after. What do you think of this...
"Well Done" = "Well-Communicated-With"
That is, if our goal is optimally communicating with as many driven Christians in the Racing Capital of the World as possible... then this could attempt to (at least symbolically) measure the NUMBER of those who feel well-communicated-with ... both in terms of LISTENING as well as SPEAKING.
Whaddaya think?
Let's start with the bottom-line bottomline bottom-line metric we're going after. What do you think of this...
"Well Done" = "Well-Communicated-With"
That is, if our goal is optimally communicating with as many driven Christians in the Racing Capital of the World as possible... then this could attempt to (at least symbolically) measure the NUMBER of those who feel well-communicated-with ... both in terms of LISTENING as well as SPEAKING.
Whaddaya think?
Post #3
Ellen wroteon October 8, 2008 at 1:19pm
That the information was accurate and complete as possible and distributed in such a way as to be actionable. If it is telling of an "upcoming event" that there be at least a week's prior notice and that any Pre-registration deadlines and "contact for further information" facts and directions be clearly stated.
In archival communications (ie. reporting of an event) that the Reporter type questions be addressed:
WHAT?
WH0?
WHEN?
WHERE?
and WHY?
PLUS any follow up. ie. contact info... ie. see web page for future planned events.
In archival communications (ie. reporting of an event) that the Reporter type questions be addressed:
WHAT?
WH0?
WHEN?
WHERE?
and WHY?
PLUS any follow up. ie. contact info... ie. see web page for future planned events.
Post #4
Christopher wroteon October 8, 2008 at 4:02pm
What: In order that we do not overwhelm the Body of Christ with Too much information, mabie we should qualify all programs/Events by asking these questions:
1. Is it colaboritive?
2. How is it accomplishing the great commission?
3. Is this reaching one church? or ministering to a geographical reagon?
Who: What people group/Geographical reagon in this event/program trying to reach?
Where: If the event is at a church building, what steps are going to be taken to ensure that the colaboritive city reaching message is communicated.
When possible, events should be at multiple chuch buildings, or in nutral locations
When possible, we should emphasize the geographical/colaboritive nature of the events.
Why: If it is clearly a colaborative/Great Commission fullfilling event, great! If not. Then mabie there are other groups that should cover it.
Just a couple of thoughts.
Blessings
Christopher
1. Is it colaboritive?
2. How is it accomplishing the great commission?
3. Is this reaching one church? or ministering to a geographical reagon?
Who: What people group/Geographical reagon in this event/program trying to reach?
Where: If the event is at a church building, what steps are going to be taken to ensure that the colaboritive city reaching message is communicated.
When possible, events should be at multiple chuch buildings, or in nutral locations
When possible, we should emphasize the geographical/colaboritive nature of the events.
Why: If it is clearly a colaborative/Great Commission fullfilling event, great! If not. Then mabie there are other groups that should cover it.
Just a couple of thoughts.
Blessings
Christopher
Post #5
Timothy wroteon October 10, 2008 at 6:10am
Besides who how why where when... we might add:
Others? this could become a standard for acknowleging and opening the door to others not affiliated with a church or ministry; Volunteering to help with an event and therefore increase cross denominational, cross church interaction; We then could measure the increase in collaboartive effort by always asking this question.... Is this ministry open to outside help in preparation, execution or followup for the event? thsi is really neede for events like Tent revivals, etc where the local churches are not included in teh advance and follow thru plans for some traveling ministries...
I also recommend that we impose limits on the length of teh response for teh who what why etc to maybe 140 chars... to improve clarity of response
Others? this could become a standard for acknowleging and opening the door to others not affiliated with a church or ministry; Volunteering to help with an event and therefore increase cross denominational, cross church interaction; We then could measure the increase in collaboartive effort by always asking this question.... Is this ministry open to outside help in preparation, execution or followup for the event? thsi is really neede for events like Tent revivals, etc where the local churches are not included in teh advance and follow thru plans for some traveling ministries...
I also recommend that we impose limits on the length of teh response for teh who what why etc to maybe 140 chars... to improve clarity of response
Post #6
Timothy wroteon October 10, 2008 at 6:13am
Did you notice I type so fast that I always hit "the" and "this" words too fast and misspell them? ha ha