Let’s send the Altantuya murderers to hell
Displaying all 12 posts by 10 people.
Post #1
Sylvia wroteon May 7, 2008 at 1:55am
Question...
Anyone dare post this in your Facebook Profile's Post Items/Notes?
http://www.malaysia-today.
Will they also take us in for linking to that post?
Anyone dare post this in your Facebook Profile's Post Items/Notes?
http://www.malaysia-today.
Will they also take us in for linking to that post?
Post #2
Umabaran wroteon May 7, 2008 at 6:16am
Post #3
Ling wroteon May 7, 2008 at 7:47am
Why not??
Post #4
David wroteon May 7, 2008 at 3:55pm
Im adding the link to my profile but is there a risk it will be deleted from the malaysiatoday website? Any updates on this?
Post #5
1 reply
Khairul wroteon May 8, 2008 at 12:28am
Naw, the article's still there. It's funny. They arrest the author for writing it but didnt bother to tell the author to delete the article. Silly, no? Because since his arrest, the blog and that article has been more popular than ever with everyone linking to it.
Post #6
1 reply
Dato' replied to Khairul's poston May 8, 2008 at 3:48am
The plaintiff can ask the defendant to delete it all they want but he needn't oblige. The Court can order him to do so, but ONLY AFTER he has been found guilty. To disobey the Court would be contempt of Court. But you can show contempt to the plaintiff as much as you like... Hahaha!
Post #7
David replied to Dato''s poston May 8, 2008 at 3:51pm
"To disobey the Court would be contempt of Court. But you can show contempt to the plaintiff as much as you like... Hahaha!"
The thing is the stupid charge of sedition is a criminal one which says you cant show contempt for the plaintiff in this case.
The thing is the stupid charge of sedition is a criminal one which says you cant show contempt for the plaintiff in this case.
Post #8
Sylvia wroteon May 9, 2008 at 8:40am
If it's seditious... then just wondering...Wondering why the said article is still online? Usually other seditious publications, articles already banned lah.
Post #9
Johnson wroteon May 9, 2008 at 11:57am
No, apparently its not even a civil suit, what more a suit of defamation. So technically the plaintiff is the government itself not whoever was mentioned. The government arms, judiciary is a tool to the government anyway so to speak.
Post #10
JunChoy wroteon May 10, 2008 at 6:03pm
So, we all know the truth. We are angry n pist off wit em.... Now, how n when will we b able to give the "devil couple" a one way ticket to hell?
Bottom line now is to get em...rite?
Bottom line now is to get em...rite?
Post deleted on May 13, 2008 at 12:21am
Post #12
Alvin wroteon May 14, 2008 at 1:16am
it words that bring justice right! Cover up is the word to discribe