Is Human Nature by Michel Gondry an underrated movie?
Displaying all 4 posts.
Post #1
Demián wroteon January 21, 2009 at 11:52am
Hi people!
I'm asking this question because I'm really concerned with the low popularity of this movie. This wonderful piece of art deserves to be recognized by many others and that's why I started a new group about it.
http://www.facebook.com/gr
Well, I don't know how to start but maybe you feel some love for him and want -like I do- to make it more popular. If you love Michel Gondry and you laugh every time you see this movie, then we can start a group for give this work a higher recognition.
Thank you! I hope you help me to start!
Demi.
I'm asking this question because I'm really concerned with the low popularity of this movie. This wonderful piece of art deserves to be recognized by many others and that's why I started a new group about it.
http://www.facebook.com/gr
Well, I don't know how to start but maybe you feel some love for him and want -like I do- to make it more popular. If you love Michel Gondry and you laugh every time you see this movie, then we can start a group for give this work a higher recognition.
Thank you! I hope you help me to start!
Demi.
Post #2
Andrea wroteon January 22, 2009 at 4:38pm
I definitely agree.
It is a great movie.
It is a great movie.
Post #3
Nicolas wroteon February 1, 2009 at 3:03am
Whaw! Some people are not half-hearted when they talk about Gondry. I personnally think the movie isn't bad at all, but i don't think i would ever try to make people think the way I do (as far as gondry is concerned);
As for the movie itself, it has really good moments and the back-and-forth technique between Human Nature and so-called Civilization brings a dynamics to the movie that compensate some cinematographic incoherences that are not even acceptable in a Gondry movie:
But Anyway, the movie is fine
As for the movie itself, it has really good moments and the back-and-forth technique between Human Nature and so-called Civilization brings a dynamics to the movie that compensate some cinematographic incoherences that are not even acceptable in a Gondry movie:
But Anyway, the movie is fine
Post #4
Demián wroteon February 7, 2009 at 3:45pm
Well, to be honest, sometimes I say that I can't call this movie a masterpiece, you can recognise several imperfections - the script is not as fluent as it could be, the plot line feels a kind of blur, and in the post-production some cuts made a few details were hard to appreciate...
Maybe I love this movie as a whole, with all its imperfections, because I feel it has some elements that make the whole whorth viewing, in a sort of way, like when you accept a person as a whole - or better, for example, if you like garage - when you feel something can be bad composed, bad executed, and even can be bad quality, but it still rocks.
I apologise if I'm not managing the english correctly, the idea is to rescue and promote that good elements - they can be different in each case - but it's OK if somebody disagrees.
Maybe I love this movie as a whole, with all its imperfections, because I feel it has some elements that make the whole whorth viewing, in a sort of way, like when you accept a person as a whole - or better, for example, if you like garage - when you feel something can be bad composed, bad executed, and even can be bad quality, but it still rocks.
I apologise if I'm not managing the english correctly, the idea is to rescue and promote that good elements - they can be different in each case - but it's OK if somebody disagrees.