
- Cohesive Wildland Fire Management StrategyGovernment Organization
- Rushad EgglestonComedian
- Northwest Fire Science ConsortiumFire Protection Service
- Great Plains Fire ScienceCollege & University
- See Moretriangle-down
PagesOtherBrandWebsiteScience WebsiteGreat Basin Fire Science Exchange
Reasons and places to be optimistic in the cheatgrass fight, really? Brian Mealor, cheatgrass expert, an associate professor at the University of Wyoming, and director of the Sheridan research and extension center, says “If we are strategic and committed to working in the places that make the most sense and have the highest chance of recovery — and by committed I mean being committed to managing for a series of years...then I think yes, we are nearing a stage where we can be optimistic.”
Not only is vegetation altered but so is future fire behavior in increased fire frequency sites in sagebrush. Research conducted in basin big sagebrush communities at John Day Fossil Beds National Monument in central OR, compares sites burned once 15 yrs ago, 26 yrs ago, and sites burned twice. Repeated burns shifted composition from shrub‐dominated to prolonged native herbaceous dominance. Fifteen years following one fire, the native‐dominated herbaceous component was 44% a...nd live shrubs were 39% of total aboveground biomass. Aboveground biomass of twice‐burned sites (2xB; burned 26 and 15 yr prior) was 71% herbaceous and 12% shrub. Frequency and density of bluebunch wheatgrass and Idaho fescue were not modified by fire history, but Sandberg bluegrass was reduced by repeated fire, occurring in 84% of plots burned 26 yr prior, 72% of plots burned 15 yr prior, and 49% in 2xB plots. Cheatgrass frequency and density were not different with fire history. Modeled rates of fire spread in 2xB sites double that of once‐burned sites. Read more at https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/10.…/ecs2.3124
See More

















































