Solar Eclipse At The Theoretical Limit

https://youtu.be/Mynn-11U6TA

Our expedition 15kms north of the village of Sarmiento, Argentina took us to the theoretica...l limit of the February 26, 2017 annular solar eclipse. The data from the unfiltered photographs by Jörg Schoppmeyer and Nicole Hollenbeck--along with video taken by Ha Kin--with the prediction positioning by Xavier Jubier--have provided further argument that the Sun is actually larger than scientifically accepted. The computations using LRO (NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) and Japan's KAGUYA lunar limb data, along with distance, elevation, orbital speeds, rotational speeds, light-time speed, index of refraction, libration and GPS are so precise that only one variable remains as to why the computations are off--the size of the Sun.

Great success during the annular solar #eclipse2017:
This annular is going to help us prove the true photospheric solar radius is indeed bigger than the IAU ado...pted value of 959.63" at 1au.
My analysis of pictures and videos from past solar eclipses over the last 60 years have already shown with little doubt that the true solar radius must indeed be increased substantially. Matching Baily's beads, both with and without filters during either annulars or totals, with simulations done with my Solar Eclipse Maestro software reveal the true story.
For ASE 2017 a few of us decided to go near or straight on the edges of the central eclipse path in order to get prolongued beading and also to measure the true solar radius. Among our small groups, Jörg Schoppmeyer, Nicole Hollenbeck, Mike Kentrianakis and Ha Kin decided to be right on the southern limit north of Sarmiento, Chubut in Argentina.
http://xjubier.free.fr/ase2017map…
This location was outside the standard 959.63" ant-umbral eclipse path and inside the 960.00" ant-umbral eclipse path. And guess what, they got true annularity for a couple of seconds (filtered and unfiltered pictures leave no doubt), which means they were indeed inside the true ant-umbral eclipse path, hence proving the true solar radius is indeed bigger than the standard 959.63" value.
Preliminary Baily's beads analysis, matching them with Solar Eclipse Maestro's simulations adjusting the solar radius, confirms this assertion and the obtained true solar radius is well inline with the value deduced from previous observations. Moreover other ASE 2017 observations lead to the same conclusion.
From the observations and the simulations we are able to provide the true solar radius value to an accuracy of about 0.02". Once the studies are complete this value will be revealed.

El eclipse del Sol anular

After annularity, in my absolute astonishment I must have said a dozen "Oh My God"s at the photographic results of my colleague's ima...ges. The precision determination of the southern limit (to the meter) using GPS and Xavier Jubier's lunar limb-corrected predictions, along with Fred Bruenjes camera control program, Orchestrator, allowed Jörg Schoppmeyer to photograph with clarity and astonishment a nearly three-quarter circle of chromosphere. Even hints of the Sun's extremely bright coronal transition zone was trying so hard to shine its coronal light through the ever-exposed overpowering photosphere.

#Argentina Day 5

Hope this is the last bad luck!!!!!

Because everything was so perfect. We got the #eclipse. The most important thing is done!