- Nothing pisses me off more than people worshiping the government, si...nging it's praises, reciting loyalty pledges to it, comparing it's agents (police, politicians, military) to God. Tell me, who is infringing on your rights? Limiting your free expression? Essentially taking your rights away? Is it bearded brown men in a cave on sand half way around the world? Is it Russia? China? No, it's that very government you worship at school or on it's holy days of worship. People will stand out of respect for the praise song of the government (the national anthem), but they won't stand for the very word of God and they certainly will not live by it. See More
- "Thus, to advocate that they DO something to protect property rights... is to necessarily advocate for the violation of property rights. The government has no desire to protect you, and couldn’t do so effectively even if it wanted to. Those who do receive protection do so at the expense of others, and those who have their property rights violated are forced to fund their own oppression." See More
- Logical AnarchyPodcast
- Anarcho ChristiansCommunity
- ChristianarchyTV Show
Loving our content? Join the action and be notified of new material!
// What’s the answer? We’ve only begun to grasp the problem, but in the past, natural monopolies like utilities and railways that enjoy huge economies of scale and serve the common good have been prime candidates for public ownership. The solution to our newfangled monopoly problem lies in this sort of age-old fix, updated for our digital age. It would mean taking back control over the internet and our digital infrastructure, instead of allowing them to be run in the pursuit ...of profit and power. Tinkering with minor regulations while AI firms amass power won’t do. If we don’t take over today’s platform monopolies, we risk letting them own and control the basic infrastructure of 21st-century society. //
The problem here is that the phenomenon of natural monopoly this article puts forth simply does not exist. The railroads and other "utilities" were not evil monopolies from which public ownership saved us. Quite the opposite is true.
With railroads, the heads of the largest railroads attempted for decades to secure cartels to no avail. They turned to the federal government to regulate the industry so as to 'rationalize the market' and 'avoid ruinous competition.'
The result was the practical nationalization of the railroad industry under the administration of the Interstate Commerce Commission or I.C.C.
The creation of this new locus of power attracted many interest groups who all sought a seat at the commission's table. Unsurprisingly, the first commission was comprised almost entirely of men representing the interests and desires of the major railroads. The result: the major railroads finally obtained the Cartel they long desired and strived to realize. But this cartel, pursuing the special interests of railroads under the guise of pursuing the public interest, was presented to the public as beneficent and it's edicts carried the sacred seal of the sovereign's imprimatur, thereby giving an appearance of sanctity to devious acts.
Over time, as power changed hands and superior political entrepreneurs in different industries obtained seats of authority, the policy objectives of the cartelizing agency shifted. Former winners became present losers and the formerly oppressed became the new oppressors. But despite this, the consumers and the industries as a whole suffered.
This same tactic was employed by A.T. & T. to secure its 70 years of dominance, the after effects we are still suffering under (e.g., last mile providers and municipal franchise agreements causing almost the entirety of the problems complained about by proponents of Net Neutrality).
Similarly, other utilities--power, lighting, telecoms, etc.--employed similar means to obtain their entrenched positions of advantage.
We do not want to give these incumbents (Facebook, Amazon, Google) the same unnatural power. Such policies have the effect of making temporary market leaders into permanent government sanctioned and protected monopolists.
From the "they hate us for our freedoms" file
We ought not dehumanize or be unloving towards any person. This does not mean we must accept every person's self-expression as valid and healthy.
We must be careful to critique with grace and compassion but we cannot let our grace and compassion go so far as to enable harmful conduct.
And here we see how the progressive movement allegedly grounded in the proper treatment of women, becomes an ideology of gender identity, and then transgender i...dentity and ends up with a man beating the living s***t out of a woman. As C.S. Lewis taught, every 'virtue' severed from God, becomes a vice. Every angel that we worship becomes a devil. Idolize compassion and you end up with men shattering women's faces.
See MoreSacrifice. Sacrifice. Sacrifice.
Sacrifice, yes! But make sure that when you do you are not sacrificing yourself to/for an Idol.
We are not black, brown, white, etc.
...We are not Americans, Mexicans, Iraqis, etc.
We are human beings. We are made in the image of God. We are all brothers and sisters.
War is murder most exalted. War is the fratricide of Cain and Abel writ large. War, and the spirits that animate It, is ultimately Deicide.
War is the will to sacrifice self in the pursuit of the sacrifice of others. It is to be willing to die, but only because dying is a necessary possibility when one is willing to kill.
War takes courage. But it is a courage misplaced and misapplied. This is why any critique of war is met with such raw emotion. To call war murder and a fraud is to say that those sacrifices were in vain service to a pretend Lord. It is to make someone's entire reality crumble before their eyes, diminish their self worth, and create a sense that one may have been a cult-like dupe who was violated and manipulated by those who knew his deepest convictions and passions--those to whom he entrusted his deepest self.
War kills all who participate in it, though only those that fall in the field are counted among the casualties.
We didn't need a war to end slavery. We needed a war to preserve the union (viz. the empire). That was Lincoln's stated purpose for engaging in war. If we were to draw parallels between this American Empire and the Roman Empire that came before it (upon which the American Empire was modeled), George Washington is Romulus and Lincoln is Caesar Augustus.
To better understand why I make this comparison, and to better comprehend why Lincoln is so idolized in our civic religion and national mythology, read David Quint's "Epic and Empire" (Princeton Univ. Press, 1993).
If it's anyone called Nazis today, it'll be anyone who's a Muslim tomorrow.
Don't get suckered by Big Eclipse Glasses.
Go to shop.altarandthrone.com instead.


Don't spend all your money on expensive big-name eclipse viewing glasses, make your own for totally free! Real scientist shows you how.
Shop now: shop.altarandt...hrone.com
Legal Disclaimer: some customers have reported challenges with driving, cycling, running, shooting, and piloting aircraft while wearing these glasses. Please wear #eclipse viewing glasses responsibly.
Establishment Democrats and Neo-Cons hypocritically align with Neo-Nazis
Source material...
=============
John McCain Went To Ukraine And Stood On Stage With A Man Accused Of Being An Anti-Semitic Neo-Nazi:
http://read.bi/1e7UAL3
XXII Congress of Ukrainians in America held in Hartford:
http://bit.ly/2vRhzrC
Ukrainian nationalists honor Nazi collaborator & other ‘fallen heroes’ with torch-lit march (VIDEO):
http://bit.ly/2n5zE2H
Ukrainian nationalists hold torchlit march in Kiev to mark anniversary of Nazi collaborator Bandera:
http://bit.ly/2vafcOs
Kiev renames major street to honor Russian Nazi collaborator:
http://bit.ly/29wUQqc
DNC’s Operative Alexandra Chalupa Worked With Bomber Kimberlin To Prevent Trump From Being Sworn In:
http://bit.ly/2vHcr9c
Additional reference for DNC's collaboration with Ukrainian nationalist-linked operatives:
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire:
http://politi.co/2jkoItO
Altar & Throne: One God, No Masters shared a post.

The Alt Right will always fail miserably to gain cultural power because it seeks to roll back 2000 years of Christianity's leavening of the West in the yeast th...at is the protection of victims. Christianity is a universalist vision that can respect and cultivate localism and traditions but will always dismantle the sacrificial hiearchies that ruled them. Its art, personhood ethic, and martyrs abhor the worship of power over others. And it disdains putting pride of kin and place over love of neighbor.
See MoreWhile we're on the subject of taking down monuments to #slavery, how about we demolish this evil beastly juggernaut? http://thelibertariancatholic.com/take-down-this-monument-…/
#taxationIsSlavery #taxationIsTheft #libertarian #Catholic #takeitdown
When using linguistic shorthand, misconceptions and misrepresentations are always lurking.
When most ardent libertarians talk about letting the free market handle a certain need or situation they are not talking about some metaphysical force as if a supreme deity called the market will work it's will for the betterment of all.
What they are advocating is the simple principle that individual persons, motivated and actuated by the divine spark present in all of humanity, will... work independently and corporately towards solving the problems that face us all and, and this is the crucial element, they do so peaceably, which is to say voluntarily / consensually.
In short, it is to actually and consistently live out the faith in humanity and God so many people, especially politicians, love to profess so boisterously when seeking to garner the praise, favor, and support of the people they seek to exercise dominion over. That is: to do justice (in one's actions), love mercy (in one's reactions), and (by) walking humbly with thy God who is, above all, Love.
//Stephen Hicks: Remember that the “law” of supply and demand is an aggregate of many individuals’ judgments and actions. It’s important not to reify it into some sort of Platonic or Hegelian abstract force that operates of generic necessity. The best way to model free markets is from the bottom up, by starting with real human beings, each of whom has individualized values, knowledge, and options."
I’ve long had a suspicion that the discomfort the critics have with classical liberalism is really a deep discomfort with the full responsibility for your life that liberalism requires."
I agree with those who criticize the methodology of some versions of free-market economics that utilize only idealized and abstract models of markets in which everyone is perfectly rational and has instant access to all information. But I disagree with the standard postmodernist move of taking the failure of such idealized models to mean that only messy chaos and crisis rule the world. In philosopher’s labels, Nietzsche is not the only alternative to Plato.//
-religious justifications for mass murder
-radical cleric
-violent barbarian
-beloved by bloodthirsty followers

































