Related PagesSee All
21,568 Followers · Media/News Company
23,243 Followers · Campus Building
8,016 Followers · Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)
79,923 Followers · TV Show
2,231 Followers · Broadcasting & Media Production Company
1,145 Followers · Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)
1,609 Followers · Personal Website
47,641 Followers · TV Show
53,510 Followers · College & University
673 Followers · Psychologist
3,827 Followers · College & University
Video Transcript
We did not want to show what they're reporting on migration was positive for. I got if we wanted to learn how journalists often unintentionally through their choice of addiction, framing and imagery contributes to less or more robust forms of reporting when pervasive habits and that we found, which could be translated into an easy mechanical lesson for determinist who went to improve their reporting pertains to the consistency in the use of active voice. when speaking of refugees and migrants journalists would overwhelmingly speak and passive speaking of refugees being quote unquote taken somewhere by buses or quote unquote given food so they were portrait as being on the receiving end of the decisions of four thirties and the authorities again. as result of the use of passive voice were often not even mentioned. So no one was held accountable for the development of event the hungry. Channels In addition to this portrait refugees and migrants as forming their own fate almost exclusively when they were aggressive or determined when they quote unquote roll each other up her quote unquote attack or a quarter quote go through everything. The more challenging suggestion would be to better describe the substance of the disagreements about migration typically between the. And you to better describe the causes of humans to better describe the possible solutions on the table instead of this before broadcasters overwhelmingly framed the dispute about migration as a various forms of power struggles with emphasis ranging from bargaining and negotiation all the way to blame games and finger pointing in the late June July 2018 periods, We found the content of three channels too much all our most of gym. Criteria for propaganda That was the hungry and state on MTV and the private TV to Annapolis stage on TV PPC. There was, however substantial difference in the brand of propaganda aired by the Hungarian channels and the Polish channel with the Polish propaganda being alone list. so it cheered for the government. many reports for instance, featured our culminated in illusions to. Problems quote cost as well by the previous government unquote and so on whereas the Hungarian brand of propaganda was intensely subject specific. so it was consistent with what is referred to as the creation of moral panic, refugees and migrants who are making to single arthritis to Hungary and Hungarians often by associating migration with the crime and terrorism. this. Supported by Francis to unverified articles from the self-referential centralized for government media system or by unverified stories that were previously disseminated by outlets owned by the Russian government or the stories previously disseminated by hyper political outlets like Bright Bart or by featuring talking heads from program and think tanks like Sam back, one example, that really is the difference between the lowest and subject specific. Was the use of double standards and the newscast of the hungry in the state on MTV from September 2015 throughout this newscast they referred to the football hooligans who wearing, according called Trust. But in the news item which described the attack of the hooligans refugee men, women and children campaign in front of the quality train station as quote unquote. Fans the anchor, meanwhile, used patronizing language to describe the attack such implicit near endorsements of violence against refugees are obviously concern. There are our hardly any editors working for the pro-government media with the time inclination or mental capacity left and to reflect on this matter. Meanwhile, there are no well established or widely accepted rules. to which the reporters could refer to in their disputes with the editors and so the reporters are left with somewhat limited options when they want to affect the content other than quitting.