
en.apologet.netWebsite
Main proof of the freedom of will is a sense of justice. We can distinguish just from unjust only with existence of free will, without it we couldn't do that.
http://en.apologet.net/proving-freedom-of-will-based-on-ju…/
From all opinions, described in Wikipedia about freedom of will, I’m claiming to have a bit different, I would say a new point of view.
http://en.apologet.net/freedom-of-will-new-point-of-view/
Recently i encounter a pretty weird, in my opinion, point of view in terms war, military, law enforcement organizations, law enforcement system and a whole organization of country in total. Here are some examples: Bible says “You shall not murder”, so, it means you can’t kill nobody, in any circumstances, which assumes that every “properly believing” christian should totally refrain from military service or working in any of law enforcement organizations, cause there you are ...obliged to kill enemies and bandits. And even furthermore, if person repented while serving on that kind of position, he should leave it! And immediately they come up quoting Jesus Christ’s words about second cheek or shirt. Christians shouldn’t be showing any resistance and just give away everything they are demanded immediately, and that’s including country, they are living in. Anyway, our Kingdom is in heaven and we are not belonging to this world, everything that we need to do is guide non-believers to repentance. And that’s pretty much the spectrum of arguments I’m facing all the time.
But is that really what God wants from us?
http://en.apologet.net/pacifism-and-god/
The moral laws are not produced by society. They were created by God.
http://en.apologet.net/morality-caused-by-the-society-is-t…/
Argument of atheists about cruelty of the world against the existence of God is the cleanest foolishness and How to explain the presence of evil and cruelty in the world, if God is absolutely kind?
http://en.apologet.net/is-god-cruel/
The topic of fight for human rights was always very popular and actual, and nowadays it is obvious that all people have got natural and inalienable rights. But what or who is the source of these rights? What rights are really natural and inalienable and what are not? Can such rights as right on abortion or special rights for sexual minorities be natural?
http://en.apologet.net/about-natural-rights-or-how-the-un-…/
The God-Absolute is everything in everything! He occupies all the time, space, matter, information, all material and non-material world. Absolutely everything belongs to the Absolute! And nothing can be that is not from the Absolute and that doesn’t belong to the Absolute. And if there is something absolutely unconnected, separate, original from the Absolute then the Absolute has never been or even existed!
http://en.apologet.net/why-god-is-the-only-one/
When we talk about God, we mean that He is the Absolute, it is meant that He is absolutely eternal and endless and has neither beginning nor end like a geometrical line. It is incorrectly to put a question «Where did God come from?» The same situation with a question: “And where did begin a line”? Next time answer an atheist: “I will say you where God is from, when you will show me the beginning of a geometrical line”.
http://en.apologet.net/where-did-god-come-from/
Who is responsible for the conscience?
Or how does morality indicate the existence of God.
http://en.apologet.net/right-vs-profitable/
In my opinion, the best argument to prove the existence of God!
In the easy to understand format.
http://en.apologet.net/the-moral-argument-a-modern-approach/
Jesus Christ as a person can not lift up a stone more that 100 kg (220 lb). But Jesus Christ as Creator created every stone and can lift up any stone.
http://en.apologet.net/can-god-create-a-stone-that-he-cant…/
The question of existence of God is not the question of faith but of knowledge! I don’t know who and when told that it is impossible to prove nor disapprove the existence of God and in such a way all Christianity was left without the foundation of faith. And the Christianity accepted this great mistake. But it isn’t like that. It is possible to prove simply and explicitly the existence of God.
http://en.apologet.net/faith-and-knowledge-or-serious-mist…/

















