It’s refreshing to see a journal resolve the concerns and provide readers with a relatively thorough explanation.
A child psychiatrist enrolled her own children in a trial that went wrong.
Another bumper crop. And: Can you help support our work?
Suchitra Sumitran-Holgersson is “guilty of research misconduct through intentional fabrication, falsification or suppression of basic material and deliberately abandoning good scientific practice in seven of the reviewed articles.”
In a recent paper, two researchers look at what happened to nearly 1,000 retracted papers over time, including how long it took to pull them, and when and how often they continue to be cited.
For the first time, Clarivate has issued an expression of concern for five journals with a worrisome pattern of citations.
One of the researchers found guilty of misconduct was one of the four whistleblowers on the case.
Last year, Richard-Lawrence Etienne Barnett, who has lost more than two dozen papers for plagiarism, published a book which appears to have a rather cozy relationship with four of his retracted articles.
Chandra has a history of scientific fraud -- and a libel suit. https://retractionwatch.com/…/by-auth…/ranjit-kumar-chandra/
A complicated and at times bizarre story involving not only scientific misconduct, but accusations of mistreatment of lab members, gambling debts, and a failed lawsuit.
