In terms of language, there are two clauses in the Amendment. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,..." makes little sense
... on its own. The second clause, "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." can stand alone. The first clause is a dependent clause, modified by the second- an independent clause. Ergo, it doesn't affect the main thrust of the total amendment- that the people may possess arms. Also- the amendment says ''people', not 'militia'. The militia IS the people. Federal law still recognizes the militia as all able-bodied men between 17 and 45 (as well as all women who are commissioned officers in the National Guard). There is another factor to consider. The men who wrote the Constitution were well-educated and had a solid grasp of the meaning of words. The Supreme Court recognizes this, and has ruled that the word "People", when it appears in the Bill of Rights means the same thing each time it is used- the mass population. Meer weergeven