• Jerry Blackburn · Top Commenter
    "I have to say No" despite the majority of your state supporting it.
    What a brainiac. I'd hate to think I was being represented by such garbage as someone who would strip my rights from me because someone else doesn't want me to have the same rights they do.
    Reply · Like
    · 75 · November 7, 2013 at 8:22am
    • Caren Tarvin · Top Commenter · Stanford
      She says she has to represent the whole state, when really she needs to represent her constituents. She's not only failing to follow the majority of the state, she's ignoring a clear supermajority of her district.

      She needs to be replaced by someone who understands what representing her district means.
      Reply · Like
      · 107 · November 7, 2013 at 8:54am
    • Suzanne TheMagician · Magician at The Magic of Suzanne · 282 followers
      And on top of that she is allow mob rule on a civil rights issue! If our leaders allow "what my constituents want" to be the determining factor when it comes to people's *rights* then we would have slavery, segregation, women wouldn't be able to vote, etc. Where we worry about what the constituents want would be on things like "do we want tax $$ to go toward paying for the new stadium?"

      Marriage equality is a human rights issue! It should NEVER have been put up for popular vote EVER!
      Reply · Like
      · 64 · November 7, 2013 at 9:14am
    • Norman Dostal · Top Commenter · UCLA
      agreed! vote this man out!
      Reply · Like
      · 15 · November 7, 2013 at 9:54am
     
Facebook social plugin