Professor Michele Dauber responds to recall critics in the Washington Post:
"In [recall opponents'] superheated rhetoric, this orderly democratic process of gathering signatures, filing petitions, and voting governed by law is a “lynch mob.” O’Connor’s view would bar voters from considering judges’ actual decisions, no matter how biased or arbitrary, when voting on a judge.
Would [opponents] make the same argument if the violent crime in question were based on the race, religion or sexual orientation of the victim? This is a radical idea that would leave judges completely unaccountable to the voters. They are certainly entitled to this view, but it is flatly inconsistent with California law."